Forums

F.A.Q. F.A.Q.    Register Register    Login Login    Home Home
Search Search
SBML Discussions » jsbml-development » Deprecated SBML-Qual attributes and elements
Show: Today's Posts  :: Message Navigator
| Subscribe to topic 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
AuthorTopic
rodrigue


Posts: 307
Location:
Cambridge UK
Registered:
February 2005
Re: Deprecated SBML-Qual attributes and elements 26 Jul '12 08:40 Go to previous messageGo to previous message

On 25/07/12 11:08, Martijn van Iersel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that my patch hasn't been applied yet. Is there anything I
> can do to help this move forward? Let me know if something is blocking
> this.
>

The patch is applied now, everything seems to be fine.

Nico


>
> On 03/07/12 12:48, Martijn van Iersel wrote:
>> I have attached a patch that removes (instead of deprecates) all the
>> relevant bits, including lisTofSymbolicValues and boundaryCondition.
>> I've checked that it compiles and produces valid SBML-Qual output.
>>
>> I'll send notifications to the sbml-qual mailing list about the removal
>> of these methods.
>>
>> --
>> Martijn
>>
>> On 29/06/12 10:50, Nicolas Rodriguez wrote:
>>> On 26/06/12 15:33, Martijn van Iersel wrote:
>>>> As you know, during the Colomoto and HARMONY meetings, we discussed
>>>> removing some of the unused elements of SBML-Qual, in the hope that
>>>> this will make the spec simpler and more mature.
>>>>
>>>> I've attached a patch that marks the concerned methods as deprecated
>>>> in JSBML. This is a conservative approach: most of these are not
>>>> actually used by any software at all. So it may be better to remove
>>>> these functions instead of deprecating them. If you wish, I could make
>>>> a patch for this as well.
>>>>
>>>> I think the only element that is somewhat used in software is
>>>> boundaryCondition on QualitativeSpecies. So it may be a good idea to
>>>> deprecate that one and remove all the rest.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I would remove them. You should send a mail to the colomoto and/or
>>> sbml-qual mailing list to see if anybody is using boundaryCondition and
>>> remove it as well if nobody reply to complain in the next week.
>>>
>>>> One final note: the ListOfSymbolicValues on QualitativeSpecies may
>>>> still come back in some form or other. However, it's certain that it's
>>>> not going to stay in its current form, so it makes sense to remove it
>>>> or deprecate it to prevent people from using it accidentally.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, we should remove it as well
>>>
>>> Let me know if you try to provide a patch for the removal of the unused
>>> attributes and elements ?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Nico
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

____________________________________________________________
To manage your jsbml-development list subscription, visit
https://utils.its.caltech.edu/mailman/listinfo/jsbml-development

For a web interface to the jsbml-development mailing list, visit
http://sbml.org/Forums/

For questions or feedback about the jsbml-development list,
contact sbml-team@caltech.edu

      

SubjectPosterDate
Read Message   Deprecated SBML-Qual attributes and elements Martijn van Iersel26 Jun '12 07:33
Read Message   Re: Deprecated SBML-Qual attributes and elements rodrigue29 Jun '12 02:50
Read Message   Re: Deprecated SBML-Qual attributes and elements Martijn van Iersel03 Jul '12 04:48
Read Message   Re: Deprecated SBML-Qual attributes and elements Martijn van Iersel25 Jul '12 03:08
Read Message   Re: Deprecated SBML-Qual attributes and elements  rodrigue26 Jul '12 08:40
Read Message   Re: Deprecated SBML-Qual attributes and elements rodrigue25 Jul '12 03:18
Previous Topic:creating an astnode with a function call
Next Topic:SBML-Qual: defaultFunctionTerm
Go to forum:
-=] Back to Top [=-

Powered by FUDforum. (Copyright Advanced Internet Designs Inc.)

Please use our issue tracking system for any questions or suggestions about this website.